From: Director, RAO Baguio [raoemo@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 6:34 AM
Subject: RAO Bulletin 1 Sep 2007
Attachments: Veteran Legislation Update 07-08-29.do= c
RAO Bulletin Update
1 September 2007
THIS BULLETIN CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING ARTICLES
-- VA Retro Pay Project [07] -------------------- (= 75% Processed)
-- NDAA 2008 [08] --------------------------- (Unre= solved Issues)
-- SSA Congressional Coverage ------------ (Who Contributes?)
-- Military Travel Discounts & Offers --------- (Vacation Ideas)
-- Agent Orange Dig in
-- Complementary & Alternative Medicine ---- (F= DA Limits)
-- Alzheimer’s [03] -------------------- (Hea= rt Impact on Brain)
-- Army Retired Soldiers Pin [01] -------- (Mailing Complete)
-- AER Scholarships ---------------- (Retired
-- AFRC Garmisch Partenkirchen ------ (Specials for Retirees)
-- VA Homeless Vets [06] --------------------- (Hou= sing is Key)
-- AXPOW Hq Data Breach ------------ (Personal Info Stolen)
-- NMCRS Scholarships -------------------- (What= 217;s Available)
-- VA Mileage Reimbursement [02] -------- (H.R.760 Impact)
-- Medicare Fraud [01] ---------------- ($2 Million Wheelchair)
-- Filipino Vet Inequities [06] -------------- (SMP Benefit Loss)
-- AO Compensation Package ------------- (ExGratia Payment)
-- Purple Heart Hall of Honor -------------- (Recip= ients Sought)
-- IRS Consumer Warning [01 ------------------ (Ide= ntity Theft)
-- SBP Automatic Coverage & Options -------- (Clarification)
-- TRICARE Reserve Select [07] ------- (Revamped Pr= ogram)
-- Military Divorce & Separation ---- (A Private Civil Matter)
-- VA Facility Expansion [06] ---- (Canandaigua Cam= pus NY)
-- VA Facility Expansion [07] ------------------ (<=
st1:place
w:st=3D"on">
-- VA Facility Expansion [08] --- (
-- VA Facility Expansion [09] --------------- (
-- VDBC [21] -------------------------------- (QoL Issues)
-- DoD Disability Evaluation System [05] - (Bush= 217;s Proposal)
-- DoD Disability Evaluation System [06] ----------- (Unique)
--
-- Shingles [02] -------------------- (Vaccine Avai= lable at VA)
-- DoD Genetic Illness Policy ------ (Genetic Discrimination)
-- COLA 2008 [06] ------------------------ (0.1% Be= low June’s)
-- Tricare Step Therapy Regime ----- (Sleep Aids Experiment)
-- Retirement Tax Considerations [01] ------ (SS &a= mp; Pensions)
-- Referral Bonus [03] -------------------------- (= Funds Run Dry)
-- Tricare Prime Networks --------------- (Too Cost= ly To Keep)
-- AF JROTC Needs Retirees [01] ---- (Active Duty P= ay Level)
-- Presidential Dollar Coins ---------------- (New = Dollar Series)
-- Merchant Marine WWII Comp --------- ($1000 Mo Pe= nsion)
-- VA Clinic Openings [07] --------------------- (<=
st1:place
w:st=3D"on">
-- Retiree Seminars 2007 --------------------------- (Where to Go)
-- Veteran Legislation Status 30 AUG 07 ---- (Where= We Stand)
Editor Note: I have ceased using the email addee raoemo@mozcom.com because spam messages at this addee have reached 150 daily. My email addee raoemo@sbcglobal.ne= t will be the primary addee I will be monitoring after 15 SEP. I am activating raoemo1@mozcom.net= as a backup in the event comms via the primary addee should become disrupted.
VA RETRO PAY PROJECT UPDATE 07: On 1 SEP 06 the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) and the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) finalized plans for disabled military retiree retroactive pay, commonly cal= led the VA Retro program. The pro= gram is designed to pay eligible military retirees any retroactive money due as a result of increases in their percentage of disability. These payments include adjustments= to Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC), Concurrent Retirement and Disability Payments (CRDP), and DVA disability compensation. Individual amounts will vary based= on differences in disability amount and length of retroactive period. No actio= n is required by the retiree to initiate the VA Retro investigation. DVA is providing DFAS with the eli= gible retiree Social Security Number. Both organizations are working together to provide eligible retirees with their full entitlements to both DVA compensation and CRSC or CRDP. As of August 2007, over 98,000 cas= es have been processed or about 75% of the original 133,000 cases. To date, the DVA has paid $133 mil= lion and DFAS has paid $28 million with the average payment being $1,638. DFAS is now processing what are considered to be the more complex accounts. These involve multiple DVA rating adjustments, shifts by retirees between CRDP and CRSC, ex-spouse pay entitlements, and other issues that require lengthy record searches. Completion of all the original cas= es is anticipated to be no later than 15 NOV 07.= Military retirees may call 1(877) 327-M-F from 08-1630 (EST). Questions concerning disability percentages should be directed to DVA at 1(800) 827-1000. For all other questions regarding military retired pay, regular recurring CRSC or CRDP payments, allotments, taxes or any other retired pay-related business, call 1(800) 321-1080 where service is available from 07-1900 M-F (except Federal holidays). Military retires can also find per= iodic updates concerning VA Retro on the DFAS web site http://www.dfas.mil . [Source: DFAS Retired Pay Newslett= er Aug 07 ++]
NDAA 2008 UPDATE 08: Both the House and Senate versions of the 2008 National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 1585 and S. 1547) have deficiencies which must be reconciled by Joint Committee this September. Neither version adequately addresses the following issues:
1. Military SBP/DIC Offset, the Widows Tax, where t= he military Survivor's Benefit Payments (SBP) are offset dollar-for-dollar of = VA Dependency Indemnification Compensation (DIC). SBP is purchased by the reti= ree from retirement pay; DIC is awarded based on death from service connected causes. The SBP/DIC offset impacts 61,000 surviving spouses. True, H.R. 1585 would award the survivor a small gratuity of $40/month compared to the typi= cal offset of approximately $1000/month. Why bother? Repeal the SBP/DIC offset.=
2. Paid up SBP. Under current law, passed in 2003, = one is considered "paid in fill" after having paid 360 premiums and is at least 70 years of age. However, those who enrolled between 1972 and 1978, g= et no relief until APR 08 when the law takes effect ... some retirees will have over-paid 34% in premiums.
3. Concurrent Receipt of military retirement pay an= d VA disability compensation. Under current law, approximately 30% of disabled retirees are eligible for either Concurrent Disability Retirement Pay (CRDP= ) or Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Some 432,000 are excluded from = CRSC because their disability is service connected (not combat related) and from CRDP because their disability less than 50% service connected.
4. Another 161,000 retirees are excluded from CRSC/= CRDP because they were medically retired under Chapter 61 with less than 20 year= s of retirement service. Section 653 of S. 1547, passed by the Senate Armed Serv= ices Committee, but not the Senate, would authorize 2.5% of basic pay for each y= ear of service. Thus the Chapter 61 receives recognition for his earned retirem= ent and would also be eligible for VA disability compensation. This is all that= was asked for in the original concurrent receipt legislation. Section 653, of S. 1547 must be retained in the final legislation.
5. Ten year phase in of CRDP. The original legislat= ion provided for a 10-year phase in the amount offset by the prohibition against concurrent receipt. According to that schedule, the maximum increment was received in 2007 (restoration 60% complete) after which the increments progressively decrease; restoration will be 95% complete in 2009; the avera= ge monthly increment in 2014 will be less than $0.30 per month per retiree whi= ch is not cost effective to the government.
Veterans are requested to contact their representat= ives and urge them to sponsor and/or support any amendments to what will become = the 2008 National Defense Authorization Act that will correct these deficiencies. One means of do= ing this is to refer to http://capwiz.com/usdr/issues/alert/?alertid=3D10241471&queueid=3D[capw= iz:queue_id] where a preformatted letter is available for editing and forwarding automat= ically. [Source: USDR Action Alert 29 Aug = 07 ++]
SSA CONGRESSIONAL COVERAGE: Despite rumors to the contrary
Congressman do contribute to Social Security and their retirement program a=
nd
have done so since 1984. Basically, they have the same plan as federal
employees. If under the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) they do not =
pay
into Social Security and do not receive Social Security benefits. If under =
the
Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) they do pay into Social Security=
and
thus receive Social Security benefits. They have the same retirement plan as
those under CSRS or FERS. They are also under the Federal Employees Health
Benefit Plan (FEHBP). Therefore, for purposes of Social Security, retirement
and medical care, they are treated the same as federal government employees.
Like all workers, members under FERS pay Social Security payroll taxes equa=
l to
6.2% of the taxable wage base, and the government (the
=
By law Title 5, United States Code (Government Organization and
Employees) defines under Section 2101 “For the purposes of this title=
-
(1) the “civil service” consist of all appointive positions in =
the
executive, judicial, and legislative branches of the Government of the
- An e= mployee of either House of Congress, or a committee of either House, or of a joint committee of the two houses;
- An e= lected officer of either House who is not a Member of Congress;
- The Legislative Council of either House and employees of his office:
- A me= mber of the Capitol Police;
- An e= mployee of a member of Congress if the pay of the employee is paid by the Secretary= of the Senate or the Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representati= ves.
- The Architect of the Capitol and any employee of the Architect of the Capitol, employees of the Botanic Gardens and employees of the Capitol Guide Service=
Fortunately for taxpayers, Members cannot retire wi= th full salary. By law the start= ing amount of a Member's retirement pension may not exceed 80% of his or her fi= nal salary. Under Social Security, members would receive an initial benefit that's about 30% of their average earnings. And even convicted Members of Congress, like former Representative Randy Cunningham, continue = to draw handsome pensions while in jail at the taxpayers' expense. Under existing law, pensions can o= nly be taken away if a lawmaker commits treason or espionage. Cunningham was sentenced to more t= han eight years in prison after pleading guilty to conspiracy and tax evasion a= nd admitting to accepting $2.4 million in bribes, not to mention a Rolls Royce. According to The Natio= nal Taxpayers Union, which tracks Congressional pensions, Cunningham who is 65 = and served eight terms in the House, could receive about $64,000 a year. Recent= ly the Senate and the House grudgingly approved major ethics and lobbying refo= rm legislation that would deny pensions to Members of Congress convicted of cr= imes such as bribery, perjury and similar crimes. [Source: TSCL Social Security and Medicare Advisor 29 Aug 07 ++]
MILITARY TRAVEL DISCOUNTS & OFFERS: Before you start planning your next trip, check out http://www.moaa.org/serv/serv_travel/serv_travel_offers/index.htm for offer= s on travel, lodging and activities. Although some are for active duty only many are available to veterans. Following are some = of the present offers:
- Batt=
leship
- The =
Grand
Ole Opry: One of the nation's=
best
live country music shows -- in
- Cirq=
ue du
Soleil: If
- Skam=
ania
Lodge: This mountain resort in the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Are=
a,
offers a great summer deal for military members (retired or active), plus 2=
0%
discounts on golf and whitewater rafting. With its waterfalls, lakes, river=
s,
and forests, Columbia Gorge is truly an outdoor playground. Hiking and moun=
tain
biking trails surround the lodge, and nearby rivers offer great kayaking. If
you are not the adventurous type you can cruise the Columbia Gorge
Sternwheeler, or take a scenic train ride through the
- JW M=
arriott
Desert Ridge Resort: This res=
ort in
- La C=
osta
Resort: This golf, tennis and=
spa
resort in the coastal foothills of
-
- Amus=
ement
Parks: Anheuser-Busch is offe=
ring a
single day's free admission to any one SeaWorld or
- Choi= ce Hotels: Travelers over 50 can save 10% at participating Choice hotels with = the 50+ Mature Travelers Rate; those over 60 can save 20% to 30% with advance reservations by requesting the Sixty-Plus Rate when they book. For more information or to make reservations, call (800) 424-6423 or visit http://www.choicehotels.com/ires/en-US/html/MatureProgram. Offer subject to availability; exp= ires 31 DEC 07. Advance purchase requirements, minimum/maximum stays, blackout dates, and further restrictions may apply.
- Irel= and B&B Vacation: Dooley Vaca= tions' Ireland West package includes airfare, first night hotel, five nights in B&Bs, Irish breakfast daily, plus (manual) car rental for as little as = $799 (for departures from New York in June or October 2007). Rate is per person, double occupancy, and does not include taxes, surcharges, or fees. Subject = to availability; some restrictions may apply. Visit http://www.dooleyvacations= .com/vacations/ireland-west/ or call (877) 331-9301 for more information.
- Revi=
sit
[Source: MOAA Travel Discounts & Services Aug 07 ++]
AGENT ORANGE DIG IN
COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE: New regulatory threats, some=
at
the urging of the pharmaceutical industry, could make it impossible for sen=
iors
to purchase certain products like vitamins and minerals without a
prescription. It may sound
outrageous, but seniors could soon be limited in their access to things as
simple as protein shakes, vegetable juice and even herbal hand lotion witho=
ut a
prescription. The U.S. Food a=
nd
Drug Administration (FDA) recently began imposing new regulations on produc=
ts
used in "Complementary and Alternative Medicine" (
= TSCL believes the regulations could be costly to seniors and to Medicare. Alternative therapy= and medical approaches are used by millions of Americans. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated, that the U.S. public spent between $36 billion to $47 billion on CAM therapies in 1997, an amount that was more than the U.S. pub= lic paid out-of-pocket for all hospitalizations in that year, and an amount that was approximately one-half of that paid by the U.S. public for all out-of-pocket physicians' services. TSCL recently submitted comments on the draft FDA regulations, stati= ng "classifying CAM products as drugs, the cost of access would increase,= as consumers may have to visit and pay a doctor for a prescription, instead of being able to choose their own vitamins, minerals and dietary supplement intake." TSCL is further concerned about the impact such regulation would have upon Medicare beneficiaries. Currently, Med= icare reimburses few CAM therapies and products and seniors must pay out of pocket. Most Part D drug plan= s, for example, don't cover vitamins and supplements. TSCL called on the FDA to withdraw= the regulations. [Source: TSCL So= cial Security and Medicare Advisor 29 Aug 07 ++]
ALZHEIMER’S UPDATE 03: Treating the heart may help the br= ain, scientists are learning. A new study suggests that treating risk factors for heart disease and stroke, suc= h as high blood pressure and diabetes, may slow the progression of Alzheimer's disease. Researchers found th= at, among the dementia patients studied, those who had their vascular risk fact= ors treated declined less than those who did not. "By slowing dementia progression, vascular risk factors treatment may delay the severe stages and have a significant impact on reducing the burden of dementia," said researcher Yan Deschaintre. The findings are important because they provide= new hope for slowing the disease that currently has no cure. There are now more than 5 million = people in the United States who suffer from Alzheimer's and the risk increases ste= adily with age, according to the Alzheimer's Association. Experts estimate that nearly half = of those 85 and older may have the disease. The cognitive risk factors include= d in the study were high blood pressure, diabetes, high cholesterol, atheroscler= otic disease (which reduces the oxygen supply to the brain and could cause strok= e), and tobacco smoking. Treatmen= t was defined as receiving blood pressure medication, insulin or drugs to lower b= lood sugar, cholesterol- lowering drugs, or anti-clotting medications. Legislation introduced in the Sena= te by Barbara Mikulski (MD), "The Alzheimer's Breakthrough Act" (S. 898= ), with companion legislation H.R.1560 introduced in the House by Rep. Edward Markey (MA), would dramatically increase federal funding for Alzheimer's research and prevention; and "The Family Assistance Act" (S. 897), also introduced by Senator Mikulski (MD), which would create a $3,000 tax credit for families caring for a loved one with a chronic condition like Alzheimer's to help pay for prescription drugs, home health care and special day care. Veterans are encouraged to ask the= ir Members of Congress to support these bills. In addition, for those needing help, contact the Alzheimer's Association at 1(800-) 272-3900, or visit it = on the web at: www.alz.org. [Sou= rce: TSCL Social Security and Medicare Advisor 29 Aug 07 ++]
ARMY RETIRED SOLDIERS PIN UPDATE 01: The mailing of the Army Retired pin
packets is complete. These packets were sent to every Retired Soldier recei=
ving
or eligible to receive retired pay and every “gray area” Reserve
Retired Soldier not yet 60 and not yet eligible to receive retired pay as of
JAN 07. Soldiers retired after JAN 07 should have received their pins from
their Retirement Services Officer. Addresses for the mailing came from the =
DFAS
Retired Pay Center in Cleveland and Human Resources Command—St. Louis=
. If
you did not receive a packet, write to: Army Retirement Services, ATTN:
DAPE-HRP-RSO (Retired Pins), 200 Stovall St., Alexandria, VA 22332-0470.
AER SCHOLARSHIPS:&= nbsp; The Army Emergency Relief (AER) offers financial aid for full-time post-secondary study for dependent children of retired soldiers. Scholarshi= ps are awarded based on financial need, academic and leadership achievement. To ensure your child will be considered mail the application and all requested documents by 1 MAR 08. In the 2007-2008 Academic Year (AY), 2,780 students = with complete applications were awarded scholarships, while 1,466 with incomplete applications did not receive scholarships. Aid ranges from $1,000 to $2,500= for financial need, plus various amounts for academics and leadership. AER administers the MG James Ursano Scholarship Fund for full-time students at = an undergraduate, technical or vocational institution accredited by the Depart= ment of Education or for first-year expenses of service academy cadets. Students= can be starting or continuing undergraduate or vocational studies for the 08-09= AY, AUG through JUN only. Funds m= ay be used for classroom or online classes, tuition, books, fees, or room and boa= rd at the school accepting the funds. Students must reapply each year and carr= y a grade point average of at least 2.0 on a 4.0 scale. A student applying for = the 2008-2009 AY may not reach age 23 before 1 MAY 09. The applicant must be an unmarried dependent child of an active duty or retired Soldier or a Soldier= who died in either status. All Soldiers and students must be registered in the Defense Eligibility Enrollment Reporting System (DEERS). You can verify the student’s DEERS status at 1(800) 538-9552. Applications for the 2008-= 2009 AY scholarships, will be available from 1 NOV 07 – 21 FEB 08 by writi= ng to: HQ, Army Emergency Relief; MG James Ursano Scholarship Fund; 200 Stovall St.; Alexandria, VA 22332-0600. The application will also be at http://www.aerhq.org from 1 NOV 07 – 1 MAR 08. Mailed applications an= d/or supporting documentation must be postmarked no later than 1 MAR 08. Other deadlines are in the instructions. Applications and supporting documentation are not accepted by FAX or e-mail. Letters mailed in JUN 08 will notify on-= time applicants about scholarship awards.
= AER’s Stateside Spouse Education Assistance Program is availab= le to spouses of retired soldiers and surviving spouses of retired soldiers who died while residing in the U.S. All
spouses must be registered in DEERS. This program d= oes not apply to second undergraduate or graduate degrees. Those who receive fr= ee tuition through their jobs may not receive AER tuition assistance. They may apply for assistance for = fees, supplies and books (no duplicates) for classes in which they’re enrol= led as full-time students which aren’t covered by other funding. Stateside financial assistance is awarded based on financial need as shown by income, assets, family size, special financial obligations and circumstances. Scholarships are awarded annually for up to four academic years of full-time undergraduate study. Students must reapply each year. Funds may be used for classroom or online classes, tuition, fees, supplies and books (no duplicates) and will be paid= by AER to the college or university. Students must maintain a grade point average of at least 2.0 on a 4.0 scale. Applications for the 2008-2009 AY will be available at http://www.aerhq.org from 1 NOV 07 –= ; 1 MAR 08 or by writing to: HQ, Army Emergency Relief; Stateside Spouse Educat= ion Assistance Program; 200 Stovall St.; Alexandria, VA 22332-0600. Students can apply online and mail the supporting documents or print the instructions and application. Material mailed = to AER must meet the deadline on the instructions. [Source: Army Echoes Sep – D= ec 07 ++]
AFRC GARMISCH PARTENKIRCHEN (EUROPE): The Edelweiss Lodge and Reso= rt Armed Forces Recreation Center (AFRC) in the Bavarian Alps is offering two special packages to retirees and their guests. The first European Escape package will run from 26 NOV – 6 DEC 07; the second will run from 6 D= EC – 16 DEC 07. The packages include airport transportation, a welcome reception, 10 nights stay with breakfast, special European Escapes tours an= d a farewell dinner and gift. The cost is $1,800 single occupancy; $2,300 double occupancy. Retirees may sponsor a maximum of three rooms. AFRC officials caution that these packages sell out quickly. For more information, go to http://www.edelweisslodgeandresort.com or call (011-49) 8821-9440 from USA, (49) 8821-9440 from Europe, or 08821-9440 from Germany. They add that they offer retiree packages year round and invite retirees to sign up for their = e-mail newsletter through their homepage. [Source: Army Echoes S= ep – Dec 07 ++]
VA HOMELESS VETS UPDATE 06: Nationwide, nearly half of t= oday's homeless veterans served in Vietnam. Many struggled for decades with drug dependency or post-traumatic stress disorder before finding themselves on t= he streets. Now veterans of the Iraq War are returning home, and a new report = by the advocacy group Swords to Plowshares says many already are seeking emerg= ency housing. A recent federal study found that female veterans are especially vulnerable to homelessness. As chairwoman of the subcommittee that funds federal housing programs, U.S. Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) was able to include= $75 million in a 2008 federal spending bill to provide more resources for homel= ess veterans. The bill has passed the Senate Appropriations Committee and will advance to the full Senate when Congress returns in September. In the wake of revelations about p= oor treatment of wounded soldiers and veterans, the Senate recently passed the Wounded Warriors Act, which directs the departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs to work together to make sure injured veterans don't fall through t= he cracks. Housing is key, said Doug Reid, Washington state director of Vetera= ns of Foreign Wars. "There's nothing more important than housing. Veterans' mental health issues don= 't get better under a bridge. They get better with stable housing." Yet meeti= ng the needs of homeless veterans requires more than providing them with a pla= ce to sleep, said Dr. Peter Hauser, chief of psychiatry at the Portland VA Med= ical Center. The vast majority of homeless veterans suffer from mental illnesses= or substance abuse problems, he said. "An integrated approach is necessary." And symptoms of traumatic brain injury may not become appa= rent for years, Hauser said. Tim Montague, an outreach worker at the transitional housing unit who until recently worked in Walla Walla, said he has found families of veterans trying to survive on the fringe of society. "They hide out in the woods," he said. "I found a whole family in the national forest living out of the back of a station wagon. They were out th= ere because the programs don't help the whole family." Larry Brennan, prog= ram director at the veterans' facility, said he doesn't see many families in crisis, but when he does, resources are scarce. He tries to place them with= the Salvation Army or the YWCA. [Source: Military.com Veterans Report 27 Aug 07 ++]
AXPOW HEADQUARTERS DATA BREACH: On 11 or 12 AUG 07 there was a bre= ak-in at National Headquarters for the American Ex-Prisoners of War, 3201 East Pioneer Parkway, Suite 40, Arlington, Texas 76010. All computer hard drives were stolen, along with several days of mail, checks and cash awaiting depo= sit and assorted paper files and records. These records include National Service Officer work, protected under Federal law. The Arlington Police Department, IRS, Department of Veterans Affairs, the United States Federal Attorney in Dallas and the USPS Postal Inspector were all notified. The concern is the database of mem= bers. These records, approximately 35,000, have social security numbers, dates of birth and VA claim numbers in them, along with names, addresses and other personal information. AXPOW members need to be alert for any fraudulent act= ivities concerning their finances. [Source: Military.com Veterans Report 27 Aug 07 ++]
NMCRS SCHOLARSHIPS: The Navy-Marine Corps Relief Society's (NMCRS) education programs help eligible Navy and Marine Corps families pursue their academic goals by providing a source of education financing through scholarships, loans, and/or grants. Awards are provided solely on the basis of the applicant's financial need, in accordance with policies established by the Society's Board of Directors. Depending on the type of program i= ts administration is accomplished by either NMCRS Headquarters or local NMCRS offices. Following are the pr= ograms offered and administered by NMCRS Headquarters:
- Vice= Admiral E. P. Travers Scholarship and Loan Program: Provides scholarships and interest= -free loans to the dependent children of active duty and retired Navy and Marine Corps personnel, as well as spouses of active duty Navy and Marine Corps service members. The Travers scholarship provides students with grants rang= ing from $500 up to $2,500 for an academic year. The Travers loan offers interest-free loans from $500 up to $3,000 (for an academic year) to studen= ts' service member sponsors. One application form is used to apply for both the scholarship and the loan. The Travers application package is posted at http://www.nmcrs.org/travers.html each October for the following academic y= ear.
- USS Tennessee Scholarship Fund, which was established upon the commissioning of= USS Tennessee (SSBN 734). The scholarship provides grants of up to $2,000 for an academic year to dependent children of service members who are serving or h= ave served aboard USS Tennessee. = The Tennessee application package is posted at http://www.nmcrs.org/spec-prgm.h= tml. Students who apply for the Tenness= ee Program may also apply for the Travers Program.
- Depe= ndents of Deceased Service Members Scholarship Program: Provides grants for an academic ye= ar to children and unremarried spouses who are military dependents of deceased service members. Awards are determined by NMCRS Headquarters Education Division. . The Dependents application package is posted at http://www.nmcrs.org/child-dec.html each October for the following academic year. Eligible applicants include:
a. Dependent children of retired deceased service members.
b. Dependent children of service members who died while on active duty not in a hostile fire zone.
c. Dependent children and unremarried spouses of crewmembers who died as a result of the missile attack on the ship in the Persian Gulf on May 17, 1987. (i.e. USS S= TARK Memorial Fund).
d. Children = and unremarried spouses of crewmembers who perished as a result of the terrorist attack of October 12, 2000 (i.e. The USS COLE Memorial Fund).
e. Dependent children of deceased military personnel who perished as a result of the terrorist attack September 11, 2001 (i.e. The Pentagon Assistance Fund).
f. Dependent children and unremarried spouses of active duty service members who died un= der hostile fire in a theater of combat operations during the Global War on Terrorism.
- Admi= ral Mike Boorda Scholarship Program: Provides grants ranging from $500 up to $2,500 for an academic year = to students in the Marine Enlisted Commissioning Education Program (MECEP), Medical Enlisted Commissioning Program (MECP), and/or Meritorious Commissio= ning Program (MCP). Applications must be reviewed and endorsed by the student's commanding officer. The Boorda application forms are posted on http://www.nmcrs.org/boorda.html each November. Application forms must be received by Headquarters no later than 1 MAY each school year. Note: In AUG= 02, the Navy's Seaman to Admiral 21 Commissioning Program (STA-21) replaced the= ECP and fleet accession NROTC Programs. This Program provides full pay and allowances and up to $10,000 in assistance for tuition, fees, and books. Consequently, STA-21 selectees are not eligible for the need-based Boorda Program.
All applicants must have at least a 2.0 grade point average. All applications exc= ept those for the Boorda scholarships must be received at Headquarters no later than 1 MAR each school year (about six months before the start of the fall semester). [Source: NMFA Government & You E-News 2= 8 Aug 07 ++]
VA MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT UPDATE 02: Section 5 of The Filipino Ve= terans Equity Act of 2007 (H.R.760) would increase the travel allowance available = to certain veterans for medical or vocational rehabilitation appointments. Veterans with a low income and veterans seeking treatment for a service rel= ated disability are currently eligible to receive 11 cents per mile for medical appointments at VA facilities with a $3 deductible each way. Those traveling for a disability r= ating examination receive 17 cents a mile. Section 5 would eliminate the deductible and link the mirage reimbursement rate to that used by the federal government to reimburse employees for work-related travel in their personal vehicles. That rate is currently 48.5 cent p= er mile. In 2006 VA spent about = $55 million to reimburse veterans for travel to medical appointments and about = $5 million for veterans traveling for disability rating examinations. Based on information available fro= m the VA the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that, in 2008, increasing the mileage rates and eliminating the deductible for medical appointments w= ould require the appropriation of about $340 million in that year alone. The cost reflects CBO’s expectation that increasing the mileage rate would also increase the number= of claims for reimbursement by about 10%.&nbs= p; Assuming the mileage reimbursement rate would increase by 2% each ye= ar CBO estimates that implementing section 5 of H.R. 760 would cost about $1.7 billion over the 2008-2012 period, assuming the appropriation of the necess= ary amounts. [Source: CBO Cost Es= timate revised 21 Aug 07 ++]
MEDICARE FRAUD UPDATE 01: A Medicare beneficiary who has a prosthetic foot due to an amputation should not need a brace for a leg that= no longer exists. Yet from OCT 02 through MAR 05, Medicare paid over $2 million for braces after the program = had paid for prosthetics for the same beneficiaries' legs, feet, or ankles. Just how many home-use hospital beds does Medicare think one senior needs? Because the government wasn't chec= king the bills closely, apparently quite a few.&nbs= p; The Government Accountability Office said earlier this year that Medicare could have saved almost $71 million from JAN 03 through JUN 05 if = the program had limited payments to just one bed per beneficiary per month. If that's not enough, Medicare als= o paid $868.85 apiece for powered pressure-reducing air mattresses. And Medicare also spent an astound= ing $2 million as a result of repeated billings for a single wheelchair. For the p= ast two years federal agents have visited dozens of sham medical equipment comp= anies in southern Florida and Los Angeles, California, that charged Medicare for prosthetic limbs, air mattresses, diabetic supplies, wheel chairs, urinary collection bags, and other medical equipment. Some of the companies existed only= on paper. Investigators reported examples of finding little more than a broom closet and a broken oxygen machine. Eduardo Moreno, for example, owned multiple medical-equipment firm= s in south Florida and allegedly billed Medicare for more than $1.9 million in equipment that was not medically necessary, including $865.85 for air mattresses. His 2004 Ro= lls Royce was recently seized. Fe= ds have also seized dozens of other bank accounts with total balances exceeding $40 million.
= The crackdown is part of an effort to protect Medicare beneficiaries from fraudulent suppliers of durable medical equipment. Nationwide, such fraud is estimate= d in the billions. Unscrupulous me= dical equipment dealers sometimes fraudulently bill Medicare without the knowledg= e of the Medicare beneficiaries, and sometimes offer money for the use of Medica= re numbers in order to bill the government for services the patients don't nee= d or never receive. Others provide equipment, but bill Medicare for more expensive equipment than the patient received. Questions about Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight have persisted for months. Industry insiders say that it's relatively easy to get a provider's billing number from Medicare and that supervision has been lacking. According to a report earlier this= year, companies continued to bill the government a total of $400,000 even after s= taff of the Health and Human Services Inspector General visited their offices and determined that the businesses did not exist. In south Florida, investigati= ons have led to the suspension of 634 suppliers out of 1,472 investigated. In Los Angeles, 770 out of 2,000 suppliers had their billing privileges revoked. CMS recently announced a series of= steps to strengthen requirements for medical equipment dealers, including stringe= nt background checks and more frequent follow-up visits. Fraud costs both taxpayers and beneficiaries. = TSCL Advisor editor Mary Johnson estimates that waste, fraud and abuse cost every Medicare beneficiary about $72 in higher premium costs in 2005, the most re= cent year for which government data is available. TSCL supports tough enforcement and prosecution of those convicted of fraud. In addition, TSCL believes Congres= s must ensure that Medicare has the investigation staff and tools required to comb= at fraud, which has been proven to save the program about ten dollars for every one dollar invested. [Source:= TSCL Social Security and Medicare Advisor 29 Aug 07 ++]
FILIPINO VET INEQUITIES UPDATE 06: House Committee on Veterans&= #8217; Affairs Ranking Member Steve Buyer (R-IN) commended the membership of The American Legion on 24 AUG for their opposition to a bill which would cut ne= arly $1 billion in benefits for elderly, disabled and financially disadvantaged wartime veterans. ̶= 0;In opposing benefits cuts to one group of veterans to pay for another group, T= he American Legion has taken a forthright and principled stand for veterans,” Buyer said. = He referred to an 17 AUG letter from the Legion’s national legislative director, Steve Robertson, to committee chairman and author of the bill H.R. 760, as amended, Bob Filner (D-CA). The letter also went to all members of the House. The bill, H.R. 760= , as amended, would grant an $8,400 annual pension for a married, non-U.S. citiz= en Filipino World War II veteran living outside the United States. A single Filipino veteran would get $6,000 per year and a surviving spouse would receive $3,600. Additionally, section 2 of the bill would qualify eligible Filipino veterans for VA medical care in the Philipp= ines. Based on information from the VA t= he congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates there will be about 30,000 elig= ible Filipino veterans living in the Philippines in 2008 and that their numbers = will decline to about 24,000 by 2012. In 2006 the VA’s average annual cost of providing medical care to vetera= ns in the Philippines was about $1700 per person and after accounting for inflation that average would increase to about $2100 per person by 2012. According to the VA estimates 25% of all veterans use VA medical care. CBO estimates that implementing se= ction 2 of the bill would increase VA health care cost by $5 million in 2008 and = $55 million over the 2008-2012 period, subject to appropriation.
=
Special Monthly Pension (SMP) is a program administered by the VA for
low income totally disabled, war veterans whose disabilities are unrelated =
to
their service. Eligible veterans who have more than one disability may rece=
ive
a higher payment in the form of a SMP at either the aid and attendance (A&a=
mp;A)
level or the lower housebound level. Those whose second disability is rated
100% are eligible to receive the A&A SMP; those who second disability is
rated 60 to 90% are eligible for the housebound level. As of 2001 veterans over 65 are pr=
esumed
to be totally disabled for the purposes of receiving the basic pension. Till a recent court hearing that
presumption did not extend to SMPs.
Veterans over 65 were required to have two disabilities rated at 100%
each or one at 100% and one rated at 60% or greater to receive the A&A or housebou=
nd
SMPs respectively. The Court =
of
Appeals for Veterans’ Claims found that the presumption of disability
eliminated the need for the initial disability rating of 100%, significantly
expanding the number of veterans eligible to receive the more costly SMP.
Sect= ion 3 of H.R.760 would change the eligibility requirements for SMPs to those in f= orce before the court ruling thus reducing the number of veterans eligible for S= MP and subsequently reducing the cost of the pension program. Based on data fr= om VA, CBO estimates that over the next 3 years, of the 20,570 veterans over 65 who are receiving the basic pension because they were presumed disabled, 75= % or 15,400 will apply for and receive a SMP.&n= bsp; From VA input CBO esti= mates 12,800 of those qualifying pensioners under current law will be found eligi= ble for the A&A SMP and the remaining 2600 will receive the housebound SMP. Estimates are that about 3000 new pension recipients will qualify for the S= MPs because of the court ruling. = Thus under current law a total of 10,350 additional veterans will receive SMPs in 2008 and using normal mortality rates an additional 13,500 will receive SMP= s by 2017 because of the court ruling. Using present and projected pension rates and adjusting for cost of living increase CBO estimates by 2017 the court ruling will increase direct spending on veteran’s pension by $485 million over the 2008-2012 peri= od and by $965 million over the 2008-2017 period. Enacting section 3 would undo that expected increase under current law, resulting in an equal amount of savings that would pay for the proposed new Filipino veteran benefits.
“Pay= ing extremely generous benefits to Filipino veterans where the median annual Filipino family income is about $2,500, shows the Chairman’s prioriti= es are wrong and paying for it by cutting benefits for elderly, poor, disabled U.S. veterans add insult to injury,” Buyer said. “We would need to pay pension recipients over $100,000 to match the buying power being given to residents= of the Philippines.” Budge= tary offsets are necessary under the “PAYGO” rules of Congress for s= uch spending. To create the offse= ts needed for H.R. 760, Filner amended his original bill by restricting eligibility for VA special monthly pension (SMP) benefits for about 20,000 severely disabled, economically disadvantaged and elderly wartime veterans. In restricting SMP eligibility, Chairman Filner “found” offsets totaling $965 million. Committee Republican= s were not allowed to offer amendments to preserve these pension benefits for U.S. veterans. “I look to other veterans advocates to recognize and oppose= the shell game at play in this bill,” Buyer said. “This is not a question abou= t the valor and contribution of the Philippine armed forces in the Second World War. That is beyond debate an= d I note that the Legion does not oppose increased benefits for these veterans. However, to fund such increases by cutting benefits for elderly, poor and severely disabled or house-bound U.S. veterans who need it most – many themselves who served in World War II – crosses the line and I agree with the Legion’s opposition to = the funding provision. The Americ= an Legion clearly recognizes this injustice, as has AMVETS and the National Association for Uniformed Services in previous statements.” [Source: HCVA Press Release 24 Aug= & CBO Cost Estimate revised 2 Aug 07 ++]
AGENT ORANGE COMPENSATION PACKAGE: Speculation is rampant as to when Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Conservative government will annou= nce a compensation package for victims of Agent Orange and other herbicides at Canadian Forces Base Gagetown. Sources told The Daily Gleaner plans were afoot for an announcement = late next week, but that has now changed. Any compensation announcement is widel= y expected to be an ex gratia payment in the range of $20,000 to $24,000. Ex gratia me= ans the funds are being paid voluntarily and the government accepts no liabilit= y. The uncertainty as to when such an announcement may be made follows the rel= ease 21 AUG of the latest health report. The document states cancer rates in the area in and around the base are no higher than in other parts of the provin= ce. The study prepared for Base Gagetown Fact-Finders Project did determine, however, that those involved in the preparation and distribution of the herbicide mix were at greater risk of developing a variety of health proble= ms, including cancer. Agent Orange was tested at Canadian Forces Base Gagetown = for four days in 1966 and for three days in 1967. The base also used commercial= ly available chemicals known as 2-4-5-T and 2-4-D on its ranges to keep forest growth down. Using the province's cancer registry, the recent report examin= ed mortality rates in the Gagetown area dating from the 1980s to 2003. While r= ates of soft-tissue sarcoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma differed little when compar= ed to the rest of the province, cancers of the breast, bone, larynx and brain = were slightly more prevalent. Dr. Judith Guernsey, the author of the report, said there was no consensus within the scientific community that herbicides were responsible for the development of those types of cancer. The report is the last in a series that downplays health risks for people living near and wor= king on the base. The final report from the fact-finders project is expected to = be on the desk of Defense Minister Peter McKay in early SEP. [Source: Daily Gleaner Michael Staples arti= cle 23 Aug 07 ++]
PURPLE HEART HALL OF HONOR: The National Purple Hea= rt Hall of Honor is conducting a nationwide effort to register Purple Heart recipients in the museum’s database. So far, 70,000 recipients have b= een registered since the Hall of Honor opened in New Windsor, NY in November, b= ut organizers hope to enroll as many as 1.5 million, said Sergio Morales, a me= mber of the museum’s board of directors. Hall visitors can access the list= of Purple Heart recipients on the museum’s 15 computers that chronicle photos and stories about those who have earned the medal. The Defense Department does not keep an official database of Purple Heart recipients. H= all of Honor organizers hope their efforts will create as complete a list as possible of those who have earned the medal to ensure they are not forgotte= n, Morales said. To register with the Hall of Honor, recipients must prove they received the medal by submitting the appropriate official documentation, including a DD-214, DD-215, WD AGO-53-55, General Orders or a Letter of Transmittal. Hall officials also requested recipients send a written narrat= ive of how they earned their medal, any newspaper articles written about them r= eceiving the medal, and any photographs of them while in the service. Although it’s not required, recipients can also tape an interview at the Hall = of Honor chronicling their service and the events that led to their Purple Hea= rt. An unedited copy of the DVD is given to the recipient, while an edited vers= ion is kept at the Hall and stored with that individual’s record. Recipie= nts can contact the Hall of Honor at (845) 561-1765 and 1-877-28HONOR, or on its website www.thepurpleheart.com. [Source: NavyTimes Mic= hael Hoffman article 27 Aug 07 ++]
IRS CONSUMER WARNING UPDATE 01: Federal agencies increasingly have= been the subject of phish scams this summer, and there seems to be no end to it.= A phishing email allegedly sent by the IRS is being forwarded to many taxpayers. It says that the recipients are entitled to an IRS refund and to obtain that refund they must click on the form indicated in the email and complete it. The email successfully eludes the spam filte= rs on many servers and the filters installed in recipient’s computer email programs such as Outlook. Her= e is a copy of one I received:
“After the last annual calculations of your f= iscal activity we have determined that you are eligible to receive a tax refund of $109.30. Please submit the tax refund request and allow us 6-9 days in orde= r to process it. A refund can be delayed for a variety of reasons. For example submitting invalid records or applying after the deadline. To access the fo= rm for your tax refund, please Click here.&nb= sp;
Regards, Internal Revenue Service”
The IRS confirms that the email is a fraud, making = it part of the 161 phishing scams that the IRS has identified this year, an IRS spokeswoman says. The IRS has received 14,000 emails from individuals who h= ave forwarded on suspicious looking emails to phishing@irs.gov, a mailbox the I= RS set up last year for individuals to send emails that look like they may be scams. IRS has issued a number of warnings in the past 18 months alerting individuals about fraudulent emails coming form the IRS. Phishers are also using the Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission to launch attacks designed to trick individuals to give up personal information or to download malware. The agencies report that emails look quite sophisticated. Although, the latest = IRS email doesn't look quite professional enough to come from the IRS, many individuals would be fooled by the official IRS logo and the screened copyr= ight statement at the bottom. [Sou= rce: GOVExec.com 28 Aug 07 ++]
SBP AUTOMATIC COVERAGE & OPTIONS: DFAS reports that there appears to= be some confusion regarding the application of the automatic coverage provision under the Survivor Benefit Plan SBP and the SBP options available to the mi= litary retiree after retirement. The information below serves as guidance on these issues.
1. Member wi= th Beneficiaries at Time of Retirement: Automatic SBP coverage applies only at retirement. The automatic cov= erage provision does not apply to any situation which may occur after the member’s retirement date. Automatic coverage does apply to any member who, on the date of retirement, 1) did not make a valid SBP election, that is, an election for = full coverage, less than full coverage, or declined coverage; and, 2) has a qualified spouse and/or child beneficiary.
2. Member w= ith No Beneficiaries at Time of Retirement: A member who has no eligible beneficia= ries at retirement is not required to submit an SBP election. Automatic coverage does not apply = in this case since the member has no eligible beneficiaries. However, if such member later acqu= ires a spouse and/or child he may elect SBP coverage. The member would have one year fro= m the date of acquisition to make an election to cover the newly acquired beneficiary. An election may = be submitted by letter provided the intent to elect is clear and all informati= on required for an election is provided. A letter which only notifies us that the member has married does not constitute an election of SBP. Again, there is no automatic coverage for an= y spouse and/or children newly acquired after retirement. In order to provide SBP coverage i= n this situation, the member must submit a valid positive written election which is received within the election period prescribed by law.
3. Member Wh= o Had SBP Coverage for Spouse and/or Child at Retirement: A member fitting this situation who later loses a beneficiary will have SBP coverage suspended du= ring the period in which there is no eligible beneficiary. Should the member subsequently acq= uire a new beneficiary in the same class as was originally provided at retirement,= the original coverage is reinstated for the newly acquired beneficiary. Reinstatement of coverage is not t= he same as automatic coverage. T= he reinstatement will happen when that person qualifies as an eligible beneficiary. For a new spouse= , it would be on the first anniversary date, or sooner, if a child is born of the marriage. For a new child, it= would be the date of birth (if a natural child) or the date of acquisition (if ot= her than a natural child).
It should be noted that upon acquisition of a new s= pouse the member does have the option to either increase the level of coverage (b= ase amount), or to terminate coverage. Such a request must be made by the member before the first anniversa= ry date of the marriage. [Source= : DFAS Retired Pay Newsletter Aug 07= ++]
TRICARE RESERVE SELECT UPDATE 07: TRICARE Reserve Select (TRS)= , a premium-based health plan that qualifying National Guard and Reserve members may purchase, was first authorized by Congress in 2005. The plan has improved every year, = but changes for 2007 are the most significant yet. A streamlined TRS health care program launches 1 OCT 07. The revamped version is affordable and simpler, with one premium level instead = of the current three-tier system. Monthly premiums will be $81 for the service member and $253 for mem= ber and family coverage. TRS offe= rs coverage comparable to TRICARE Standard and Extra. Members of the Selected Reserve can find out more about TRS and locate their TRICARE regional contractor contact information by entering their profile at the “My Benefits” portal at www.tricare.mil. The revamped TRS also includes expanded survivor coverage, continuously open enrollment and much more. Gone are service agreements and differing qualifications for each of the three tiers.
= There are now only two qualifications for TRS under the restructured program. First, the member must be a Selected Reserve member of the Ready Reserve. Second, the member m= ust not be eligible for the Federal Employee Health Benefits (FEHB) program or currently covered under FEHB (either under their own eligibility or through= a family member with FEHB). Nat= ional Guard and Reserve members can contact their Reserve Component points of con= tact if they have 30 SEP 07. In es= sence, the old TRS ceases to exist and the new TRS starts 1 OCT 07. A letter from Secretary Hall was s= ent to the approximately 11,500 members currently covered by TRS. The letter explained the program c= hanges and how to continue TRS coverage under the restructured program. All qualif= ied members of the Selected Reserve who wish to purchase TRS under the restruct= ured program must fill out the new form and forward it to the appropriate TRICARE regional contractor. If the m= ember is new to TRS, or currently mails the monthly premium payment, then one month’s premium must be sent with the form. Two forms, for the old TRS program in effect through 30 SEP and the new TRS program beginning 1 OCT, a= re available to eligible members of the Selected Reserve from the National Gua= rd and Reserve Web portal located at https://www.dmdc.osd.mil/appj/trs/index.j= sp. Since the current Tier program is in effect until 1 OCT, eligible members w= ho wish to purchase TRS coverage now, and then continue under the new program, will need to send in both forms. [Source: MHS News Rele= ase 13 Aug 07 ++]
MILITARY DIVORCE & SEPARATION: Overall, it's important to r= ealize that the military considers divorce and separation to be a private civil ma= tter, best resolved by the courts. Sometimes military spouses expect too much out= of military authorities. They think they can contact their spouse's commander,= and the commander will waive a magic wand and make everything better. In most cases, that's unrealistic. The commander has limited authority in the area of divorce & separation. The military only becomes involved in domestic situations in very limited, spec= ific ways -- procedures which are authorized under law or military regulation -- usually when it concerns pay, benefits, property, etc., which are regulated= by federal law. In a vast majority of military domestic situations, the correct procedure is to obtain an attorney, and take it to court. Military personnel and family members all have access to free legal services provided by the l= egal office (JAG). What most people don't realize, however, is the JAG is of very little help when it comes to divorce and separation. At most, the JAG can g= ive you general advice. They cannot prepare divorce or separation documents, th= ey cannot represent you in court, they cannot file legal divorce or separation paperwork for you. Quite often, even the general advice may be of little us= e, as there is no requirement that a military lawyer be licensed to practice l= aw in the state they are stationed in, so the lawyer's knowledge of divorce laws = of that particular state may be limited. For military divorce, separation, or child support situations, you need to consult with a civilian attorney, knowledgeable of the divorce laws of your particular state. The lawyer you choose should also have extensive experience with military-related family l= aw because many things are different between military-related and civilian domestic situations. A family lawyer with military-related family law experience will have knowledge of the provisions of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SSCRA) and the Uniform Services Former Spouse Protection Act (USFSPA), as well as specific provisions required for garnishment of milita= ry pay. Start by calling your lo= cal bar association, and ask them for a list of divorce lawyers in your area who specialize in military-related divorce situations. Some lawyers who special= ize in military-related divorce situations advertise on the Internet (i.e. http://usmilitary.about.com/od/div= lawyers/Divorce_Lawyers.htm). Many lawyers offer free initial consultations. Take advantage of that. Interview several lawyers and choose the best one for your particular situation.
Military ID Cards. Often military members mistakenly think that because regulations require them to submit an application for fa= mily member ID cards, and because they are listed as the sponsor, that they can confiscate their spouse's ID card any time they choose. However, family mem= ber ID cards (and the privilege granted by such cards) are an entitlement, gran= ted by congressional law (not the sponsor). In other words, it's Congress who g= ets to decide who can and cannot have an ID card, not the military sponsor. A military member who unlawfully takes an military identification card away f= rom his/her spouse can be charged for Larceny under the provisions of Article 1= 21 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). All of the services use the same joint regulation which governs the issuance of military identification cards. If the military member refuses to sign the application for an ID for= a military dependent, the regulation contains provisions where the Personnel Office may indicate such on the application form, and issue the ID card any= way. In most cases, the nonmilitary spouse will lose his/her ID card (and privil= ege) once the divorce is final, with two exceptions:
a.) 2= 0/20/20 former spouse. Full benefits (medical, commissary, base exchange, theater, etc.) are extended to an unremarried former spouse when the parties had been married for at least 20 years; the member performed at least 20 years of service creditable for retired pay; and there was at least a 20 year overla= p of the marriage and the military service.&nbs= p; If the former spouse is covered by an employer-sponsored health care plan, medical care is not authorized. However, if coverage is terminated, military medical care benefits may be reinstated upon application by the fo= rmer spouse.
b.) 2= 0/20/15 former spouse. The former spouse qualifies for medical benefits (no commiss= ary, bx, etc.) for one year from the date of the divorce, dissolution or annulme= nt, when the parties had been married for at least 20 years; the member perform= ed at least 20 years of service creditable for retired pay; and there was at l= east a 15 year overlap of the marriage and the military service. If the former spouse is covered by= an employer-sponsored health care plan, medical care is not authorized.
Base Housing. While on-base family housing is issue= d to the military member, the member does not have the authority to evict his/her military family members. Only the installation commander has that authority= . In fact, in most cases, when a domestic situation has deteriorated to the point where physical separation is warranted, the first sergeant and/or commander will usually order the military member to reside in the dormitory (barracks= ). This is because the military has the authority to house in the dormitories = at no charge to the military member, but it has no authority to provide no cost billeting to military spouses. However, military family housing, by law, can only be occupied by military members who reside with their family members (other than authorized exceptions, such as when the military member is deployed, at sea, or servin= g in a remote-tour area). The services all have regulations which require the fa= mily housing unit to be vacated (usually within 30 days) if the military members stops residing there, or if there are no family members residing there. So,= in most cases, in the event of a separation, the party remaining in the base housing unit must vacate unless the remaining party is the military member = and other dependents, such as children, remain. The military will not pay for s= uch moves, however. While the Joint Travel Regulation (JTR), paragraph U5355C authorizes the military to pay for short-distance household good transporta= tion in the event a military member is ordered out of base housing, the regulati= on specifically prohibits this provision to be used for personal problems. The regulation states: "A short distance HHG move, incident to moving to/f= rom Government quarters, is not authorized to accommodate a member's personal problems, convenience, or morale."&nb= sp; [Source: About.com: U.= S. Military Rod Powers article 21 Aug 07 ++]
VA FACILITY EXPANSION UPDATE 06: To provide better health car= e into the 21st century for New York state veterans, the Department of Veterans Affairs has announced several major enhancements at the Canandaigua VA Medi= cal Center. VA is developing modernization plans for the Canandaigua campus that include construction of a new single-floor 120-bed nursing home, a new 50-b= ed residential rehabilitation facility and a renovated outpatient building to = meet the current and anticipated needs of Finger Lakes area veterans. The new facilities will be designe= d to preserve the historic core of the campus by renovating buildings in one of = the historic courtyards to retain the ambiance of the 171-acre campus. VA will also explore partnerships = with the private sector to generate revenue and complementary services for veter= ans by leasing under-used buildings and land at Canandaigua. VA Secretary Nicholson also announ= ced Canandaigua is being designed as a “VA Mental Health Center of Excellence,” working in collaboration with the department of psychiat= ry at the University of Rochester. In this capacity, the facility will oversee a broad range of efforts (locally, regionally and nationally) to improve mental health care for veterans. As a Center of Excellence, the facility will focus on suicide prevention, post-traumatic stress disorder and other mental health issues.<= span style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'> In the interim VA has officially o= pened its National Suicide Prevention Hot Line (1-800-273-8255) at Canandaigua, w= hich provides round-the-clock national assistance for veterans. The program is an important collaboration between VA and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration in the Department of Health and Human Services. The new construction and modernization at Canandaigua was a result of the Capital A= sset Realignment for Enhanced Services (CARES) review process, which began in 20= 04 to upgrade VA health care facilities across the country. Plans for the Canandaigua VA Medical Center will be integrated into the Secretary's nationwide capital plan so that a timetable and budget can be established, followed by congressional consideration for authorization and funding. As VA develops construction plans = for the future of the facility, the Department will examine the potential use of portions of the 171-acre campus to assist in the delivery of other complementary services for veterans. [Source: VA Media Relations 16 Aug 07 ++]
VA FACILITY EXPANSION UPDATE 07: A new Health Care = Center in Harlingen TX announced 20 AUG by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) will vastly improve care to Valley veterans in South Texas, eliminating the vast majority of trips required by veterans to VA medical facilities in San Antonio. The plans will provi= de a new VA health care center on the campus of the University of Texas in Harlingen. The announcement, which came after an independent study on the future needs of Valley veterans requested by Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, included plans to expand services by VA health care facilities in McAllen a= nd Corpus Christi. Bill Feeley, VA’s Deputy Under Secretary of Health for Operations and Management said, “Once completed, the new health care center in Harlingen will eliminate about 95% of the trips veterans currently have to make to San Antonio for medical services. This plan will allow us to start providing specialty services to Valley area veterans this year, with = even more expansion of services next year.” The plans call for increasing = the current VA health facility space in Harlingen from 11,700 square feet to ne= arly 160,000 square feet by 2010. = When the facility is completed in DEC 08, it will provide a full range of expand= ed services in collaboration with the University of Texas Regional Academic He= alth Center, including specialty and diagnostic services, such as pharmacy, digi= tal x-rays, CT scans, MRIs and other services; and outpatient surgeries, such as cataract removals, diagnostic colonoscopies and prostate biopsies, supporte= d by outpatient operating rooms. [Source: VA Media Rela= tions 20 Aug 07 ++]
VA FACILITY EXPANSION UPDATE 08: On 21 AUG the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) announced a preferred downtown site for reconstructi= on of a VA Medical Center in New Orleans LA.&= nbsp; Secretary of Veterans Affairs Jim Nicholson said the preferred site = is located on 34 acres of land bounded by South Rocheblave Street to the north, South Galvez Street to the south, Tulane Avenue to the west, and Canal Stre= et to the east. VA continues to evaluate collaboration with other local health care providers for shared services based on physical, financial and programmatic viability, including support for overall health care redesign. The downtown site must now underg= o a mandatory environmental assessment, along with another site under considera= tion located 4.5 miles away in Jefferson Parish. At the conclusion of the review, a= final decision on the site and acquisition of the land will be concluded. This ye= ar, VA expects to spend more than $1.2 billion in Louisiana for the state’= ;s 350,000 veterans. VA operates= major medical centers in Alexandria and Shreveport, eight community-based outpati= ent clinics, Vets Centers in Kenner and Shreveport and a nursing home in Alexandria. [Source: VACO OPIA Early AM Rpt 21 Aug 07 ++]
VA FACILITY EXPANSION UPDATE 09: Modern facilities for the future h= ealth care needs of Los Angeles veterans, new services for local homeless veteran= s, a columbarium and a regional office for the Department of Veterans Affairs (D= VA) are all closer to becoming reality. DVA Secretary Nicholson’s announcement came as a VA contractor completed its study of the West Los Angeles VA Medical Center under the Capital Asset Realignment for Enhanced Services (CARES) review process, which began in 2004 to upgrade VA health c= are facilities across the country. The study’s conclusions will be presen= ted to the public and to a Local Advisory Panel appointed by VA to help the Department with its capital master plan.&n= bsp; That meeting is scheduled for 6 SEP from 17-2100 at the Wadsworth Theater on the campus of the West Los Angeles VA Medical Center at 11301 Wilshire Boulevard. Nicholson also announced his decision to designate buildings 205, 208 and 209 available for homeless veterans programs. Plans = to build a VA columbarium and relocate the VA regional office to the site are = also included in all the options. The new columbarium will provide critically ne= eded space for the cremated remains of veterans. Relocating the regional office, wh= ich handles claims for disability pay and other VA benefits, from the Los Angel= es Federal Building to the medical center campus will provide more convenient services for veterans who need to coordinate medical care with benefits cla= ims processing.
= Agreement has been reached with the Veterans Park Conservancy to designate 16 acres of land for use on the West Los Angeles campus. All improvements and any changes w= ill first be approved by VA. The designation will be considered as part of any final CARES decision. At the Local Advisory Panel meeting, the consultant who prepared the study for VA = will present a detailed analysis of the modernization options for VA to consider= as the Department prepares to meet the future needs of southern California veterans. These options inclu= de:
• Constructing a new VA hospital;
• Renovating the existing hospital;
• Building a new VA nursing home;
• Modernizing the hospital’s inpatient and outpatient mental health facilities.
The meeting is the third public forum the Local Adv= isory Panel has held since the beginning of the CARES process. Time will be set aside for questio= ns, and for community members to provide VA with their input on the proposed modernization plans. All options will take into account land already set as= ide for a new California state nursing home for veterans. The recommendations of the Local Advisory Panel and community feedback will be submitted to VA with the final report. [Source: VACO OPIA Early AM Rpt 21 Aug 07 ++]
VDBC UPDATE 21:&nb= sp; The Veterans' Disability Benefits Commission (VDBC) has moved closer to completing its Oct= ober report to Congress, tackling a multitude of recommendations from the Instit= utes of Medicine (IOM). Most of IO= M's 40-plus recommendations were accepted by the commission, including those concerning the impact a disability has on a veteran’s quality of life (QoL) and changes to individual unemployability (IU) determination and compensation. Here are some highlights of the commission-approved recommendations:
- VA s= hould compensate for work disability, loss of ability of useful life activities, = and loss in QoL.
- VA s= hould develop a tool for measuring QoL, including the effects of disability on fa= mily members.
- Cong= ress should increase compensation rates 25% as an interim measure to address los= s of QoL, pending development and implementation of a QoL measure.
- VA s= hould develop and test incentive models that would promote vocational rehab and return veterans to gainful employment.
- VA s= hould require vocational assessments in determining unemployable eligibility.
- VA s= hould gradually reduce the unemployability portion of disability compensation for those able to return to employment rather than abruptly terminating it
The Commission also developed two recommendations addressing the Center for Naval Analyses' testimony highlighting that membe= rs who become severely disabled at younger ages face a greater financial penal= ty because their earning careers are cut short, vs. those whose severe disabilities develop later in life. It recommended increasing compensation rates for younger disabled veterans to help eliminate the disparity.&= nbsp; It also proposed paying a "severely disabled stabilization allowance" during the first three years after leaving service, to bett= er address out-of-pocket costs severely disabled servicemembers face in their transition to civilian life. [Source: MOAA Leg Up 24 Aug 07 ++]
DOD DISABILITY EVALUATION SYSTEM UPDATE 05: The Bush administration is preparing a legislative proposal to present to Congress in SEP 07 that would establish a separate and, under most circumstances, a more generous disabil= ity package for service members who are injured in war or while training for wa= r, sources said. Under the plan, recommended by the Dole-Shalala commission, service members found unfit for duty as a result of combat or combat-traini= ng injuries, regardless of the number of years served, would qualify for an immediate lifetime annuity from the Department of Defense. Annuity amounts would be based on the formula used to calculate regular retired pay: 2.5% o= f basic pay multiplied by years in service. A wounded warrior with two years of ser= vice thus would get 5% of basic pay. Likewise, a service member injured in combat training who had served 10 years when found unfit would get 25% of basic pa= y. These members also would be get lifetime TRICARE, the military health and pharmacy plan. Separately they would get disability compensation from the Department of Veterans Affairs for any and all service-connected injuries or ailments. VA compensation likely would be raised under the plan to include a quality-of-life allowance. But the portion of VA compensation now provided,= and intended only to cover reduced earnings capacity, would stop at age 65 when social security begins. Issues not addressed regarding ability to draw social security are:<= /p>
1. Unless so= mething is done very soon, because of decades of bad accounting practices, the Soci= al Security Trust Fund is projected to go bankrupt in 30 years. The President’s plan transfe= rs the disabled veteran to a rapidly sinking ship without a life jacket.
2. What of t= he disabled service member who has less than 10 years Social Security earnings? Those with less tha= n 10 years earning receive no benefit. There are already laws in place that reduce the Social Security Bene= fits for having less than 30 years of Social Security Earnings … The Windf= all Elimination Provision is one of these laws.
= The legislation is being drafted by DoD and VA officials and they continue to work out critical details. One issue outstanding is whether the changes should be applied retroactively, perhaps to all combat-related disa= bled members injured since the attacks of 9-11. But the Bush administration has decided that these disability pay changes should apply only to members with injuries from combat or combat training.&n= bsp; That, officials say, adheres to the theme of Dole-Shalala, also know= n as the President's Commission on Care of America's Returning Wounded Warriors. Because the commission's charter focused solely on the needs of combat woun= ded veterans, its recommendations do too. Under the White House plan, non-combat disabled members still would come under current service disability retireme= nt, with percentage awards based only on conditions that make the individual un= fit for service. Non-combat disabled members rated below 30% still would get a lump-sum severance payment instead of an annuity and would not qualify for TRICARE. This point is expected to be vigorously opposed by advocates for disabled members. Though they generally are excited about the changes plann= ed for combat-related injuries, advocates see stark inequities in having separ= ate disability packages, one for wounded warriors and one for members with other service-connected injuries or ailments.
= The White House position also seems to be in conflict with a princip= le of the Veterans' Disability Benefits Commission, which will complete its two-year comprehensive study of disability benefits in OCT 07. That commiss= ion already has voted not to treat disability benefits differently based on whe= ther an injury is received in combat, advocates point out. One administration official brought another warning. If the VA-portion of disability compensation is not boosted as much = as envisioned by Dole-Shalala, then certain disabled warriors actually might receive less in overall disability pay than non-combat disabled peers with equal rated conditions. Though advocates for disabled veterans see the Dole-Shalala disability pay reforms= as overwhelming positive for service members, which is why they want Congress = to apply the changes to all members being separated as physically or mentally unfit, there are anomalies to be addressed, they said. For example, an E-4 = with four year's service and a 30% rated a disability that leaves him unfit for = duty would get service disability retirement today of $546.07 a month. Under Dole-Shalala, if VA compensation remains at current levels, with no qualify-of-life allowance, the same E-4 injured in war would receive longev= ity retirement of $182.02 a month for his four years of service plus VA compensation of $348. The total of $530.02 a month would be $16 less than awarded to the non-combat disabled member. Even in this case, however, VA compensation of $348 a month is only for the unfitting condition. The VA typically will base compensation for any disabled veteran an average of 20% higher than the rating used for service retirement because the VA considers= all service-connected conditions not just those that make the member unfit for continued service.
= Several military associations and veterans groups met 31 JUL with Ka= ren Guice, the Dole-Shalala commission's deputy staff director, to clarify what commissioners intended regarding two military disability systems. Retired A= ir Force Col. Mike Hayden, a benefits expert with Military Officers Associatio= n of America, said Guice assured the group that commissioners, if asked, would recommend that their disability pay reforms extend to all disabled members = not just the combat injured. That= seems in keeping with the report's criticism of the confusion and complexity that= now exists with DoD and VA having separate disability systems. Dole-Shalala wou= ld end that dual track, removing DoD from the rating business. Yet the White H= ouse seeks to have separate disability systems within DoD itself, citing the same report. This has drawn critic= ism even within the administration as concerns rise over the impact on morale of categorizing disabled members based on where or when they are injured. President Bush, during a 13 AUG visit to the VA medical center in Washington D.C., said the Dole-Shalala recommendations "make a lot of sense, and = we would ask for the Congress to pass those as quickly as possible, so I can s= ign them into law." To comment on how do you feel about this issue, e-mail milupdate@aol.com, write Military Update, P.O. Box 231111, Centreville, VA, 20120-1111 or visit: www.militaryupdate.com? Also, let your public officials know how you feel. This can be easily done by referring to http://capwiz.com/usdr/issues/alert/?alertid=3D= 10240471&queueid=3D[capwiz:queue_id] to forward a preformatted message or one of our own making to your representatives. [Source: Military.com Tom Philpotts article 23 Aug 07 ++]
DOD DISABILITY EVALUATION SYSTEM UPDATE 06: The Military Officers Associ= ation of America (MOAA) has informed their members that sources tell them the Bush Administration has directed the Defense Department to move out quickly and develop a legislative proposal to change the military disability retirement= system. But the proposal would be strictly limited to people who are disabled by combat-related wounds, as recommended= by the Dole-Shalala Commission on Care for America’s Returning Wounded Warriors. MOAA agrees rapid action is needed, but believes strongly the nee= d to slow down this train just a little, and think twice before pushing an idea = that might follow the letter of a Commission recommendation, but would completely violate its spirit. MOAA has = talked to the Dole-Shalala commission members and staff, and they say in no uncert= ain terms that they never intended to propose a unique retirement system for combat-disabled members. They= only looked at combat-disabled members because that's who their charter covered,= so that's who's addressed in their report.&nb= sp; But they'll tell anyone who asks that they think the same retirement= and compensation rules should apply to all service-connected disabled members, = not just those wounded in combat. That view is echoed strongly by the Veterans' Disability Benefits Commission, a separate group that's been studying the military and VA disability systems for two years and is due to report to Congress this fall. They recognize that, if military service causes a disability, the impact on the servicemember is the same, whether it was cau= sed by a bullet, a building fire, or a military vehicle accident. It should be = kept in mind that one of the purposes of the Dole-Shalala commission was to help find solutions to the maze of administrative roadblocks that kept disabled members and families from understanding their options and benefits. Proposing a new unique disability process that only applies to a relatively small percentage of disabled memb= ers will hardly make the system any easier to navigate, and will only create ma= jor new inequities. As we try to expedite action on the valuable recommendation= s of these important commissions, we must make sure we listen to what they're actually saying. [Source: MOA= A Leg Up 24 Aug 07 ++]
VET CEMETERY HAWAII: To ensure Hawaii veterans continue to have a final resting place that honors their service to the nation, a senior official of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) announced on 21 AUG the award of a $743,035 grant to expand the West Hawaii Veterans Cemetery in Kona. The grant will pay for the initial development of a new burial section, including 306 full-casket burial sites= , an automated irrigation system and sod. Full development will include a committal service shelter, an assemb= ly area, an in-ground cremation burial section, a restroom facility, a service yard with a covered storage area, supporting roads, walkways and infrastructure. Hawaii has seven other VA-funded state cemeteries: Hawaii State Veterans Cemetery in Kaneoh